An in vitro model to mimic the thrombotic occlusion of small vessels in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS).

Platelet activation and decrease in platelet count characterize the development of the most feared form of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), i.e. catastrophic APS (CAPS). We aimed to assess if immuno-affinity purified anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies enhance platelet activation inducing a significant flow obstruction in a platelet function analyzer (PFA). Affinity purified aß2GPI antibodies were obtained from 13 triple positive patients with a strong lupus anticoagulant (LA) and high titers of IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and IgG aß2GPI. Platelet activation stimulated by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the presence or absence of aß2GPI was measured by the expression of P-selectin on platelet surface using flow cytometry. P-selectin expression remained close to baseline when normal whole blood was incubated with aß2GPI alone. When stimulated using aß2GPI combined with ADP, P-selectin expression (28.42 ± 5.15% vs. 20.98 ± 3.94%, p = 0.0076) was significantly higher than ADP alone. Closure time of normal whole blood passed through the PFA was significantly shorter using affinity purified aß2GPI than control IgG both in Col/ADP (160.1 ± 62.1 s vs. 218.6 ± 43.8 s; p = 0.021) and Col/EPI cartridges (149.5 ± 26.7 s vs. 186.9 ± 45.5 s; p = 0.030). Thus, platelet activation is enhanced by aß2GPI antibodies with a consequent premature closure in a PFA, possibly resembling that in microcirculation in patients with CAPS.

Lupus anticoagulant identifies two distinct groups of patients with different antibody patterns.

BACKGROUND: Whether antibodies directed to ß2-Glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) are responsible for LA activity is not well defined. However, in the absence of such antibodies the molecule responsible for LA phenomenon is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the biochemical identification of the target antigen epitope of aPL responsible of LA activity in the absence of aß2GPI antibodies together with the biological and clinical characteristics of these patients in comparison with classical triple positive patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: A comparison of patients with LA without (LA+/aß2GPI-) and those with (LA+/aß2GPI+) associated aß2GPI antibodies was performed. Size exclusion chromatography and analytical chromatography were used to identify the molecule with LA activity in patients LA+/aß2GPI-. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Analytical size-exclusion chromatography revealed a peak of 996Kd with LA activity perfectly overlapping that of IgM anti phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. Similarly, all the 25 LA+/aß2GPI- patients were positive for aPS/PT antibodies. LA+/aß2GPI- compared to 33 LA+/aß2GPI+ patients turned out to be significantly older, with a lower rate of previous thromboembolic events and a weaker LA activity. Search for aPS/PT and aß2GPI antibodies in patients with LA is useful to identify two subgroups of LA at different risk of thromboembolic events.

Point of Care Testing (POCT) to assess drug concentration in patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

BACKGROUND: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not need routine laboratory monitoring but measurement of drug concentration is important in emergency conditions. Specific laboratory tests are not readily available or not implemented in every hospital. Point-of-Care Tests (POCT) may bridge this gap and be used as a bedside solution. OBJECTIVES: Feasibility of POCT to assess plasma levels of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban. PATIENTS/METHODS: Activated Coagulation Time-Low Range (ACT - LR) using a portable Hemochron Signature Elite for dabigatran and prothrombin time (expressed as INR) by Coaguchek XS Pro for rivaroxaban and apixaban were obtained at trough and peak in 136 consecutive patients taking NOACs (70 on dabigatran, 45 on rivaroxaban and 20 on apixaban). Using a paired study design, drug concentrations were concurrently determined by functional specific tests. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between NOACs concentration and the values obtained using the POCTs was high for dabigatran and rivaroxaban (r = 0.80 and r = 0.82, respectively) and low for apixaban (r = 0.21). ACT-LR ≤ 188 s better detected dabigatran levels ≤ 50 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 84.1%. ACT-LR values > 217 s better discriminated value of dabigatran > 200 ng/ml, with a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 81.4%. INR Coaguchek values ≤ 1.2 better identified patients with rivaroxaban values < 100 ng/ml, with sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 88.5%. This analysis was not possible for apixaban. CONCLUSION: In emergency situations POCT use may provide useful immediate information on dabigatran and rivaroxaban concentration.

Thrombocytopenia in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Essentials The prevalence of thrombocytopenia in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is not well defined. We studied triple positive patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and its catastrophic variant. Prevalence of thrombocytopenia was 6% and 100% in patients who developed the catastrophic form. In triple positive patients thrombocytopenia is low and platelets drop during the catastrophic form. SUMMARY: Background Thrombocytopenia is the most common non-criteria hematological feature in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This condition is more common in patients with catastrophic APS (CAPS). Objectives To evaluate the prevalence of thrombocytopenia in a large series of high-risk patients with APS, and to assess the behavior of the platelet count during CAPS. Methods/Patients This was a cross-sectional study in which we analyzed the platelet counts of a homogeneous group of high-risk APS patients (triple-positive). Six of these patients developed a catastrophic phase of the disease, and the platelet count was recorded before the acute phase, during the acute phase, and at recovery. Results The mean platelet count in 119 high-risk triple-positive patients was 210 × 109 L-1 . With a cut-off value for thrombocytopenia of 100 × 109 L-1 , the prevalence of thrombocytopenia was 6% (seven patients). No difference between primary APS and secondary APS was found. In patients who suffered from CAPS, a significant decrease from the basal count (212 ± 51 × 109 L-1 ) to that at the time of diagnosis (60 ± 33 × 109 L-1 ) was observed. The platelet count became normal again at the time of complete remission (220 ± 57 × 109 L-1 ). A decrease in platelet count always preceded the full clinical picture. Conclusions This study shows that, in high-risk APS patients, the prevalence of thrombocytopenia is low. A decrease in platelet count was observed in all of the patients who developed the catastrophic form of the disease. A decrease in platelet count in high-risk APS patients should be considered a warning signal for disease progression to CAPS.

The role of platelets in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Despite extensive research, the pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) remains obscure in many aspects. However, it is widely accepted that thrombosis is the result of a hypercoagulable state caused by antibodies directed against ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2-GPI), a protein whose physiological role is unknown. Although underestimated, platelets may be involved in APS and its thrombotic manifestations, especially arterial, in several ways. Thrombocytopenia is the most relevant non-criteria manifestation of APS, possibly caused by direct binding of anti-ß2-GPI antibodies or anti-ß2-GPI-ß2-GPI complexes. On the other hand, platelets may have a key role in APS-related thrombosis due to the presence of multiple receptors that can interact with anti-ß2-GPI antibodies (especially apolipoprotein E receptor 2' (apoER2') and glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα)) with consequent release of different procoagulant mediators such as thromboxane B2, platelet factor 4 (PF4), and platelet factor 4 variant (CXCL4L1). The aim of this review is to put together evidence on the possible role of platelets in APS and to stimulate further research on the issue.

APS - Diagnostics and challenges for the future.

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is essentially based on the detection of circulating antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. Progress have been made on the standardization of tests exploring the presence of aPL as guidelines on coagulation and immunological tests were recently published in the literature. Clinical relevance of aPL profile has come from prospective cohort studies in populations with a homogeneous antibody profile supporting the view that triple positivity is a high risk pattern in patients and carriers. In addition to the classic ones, several other tests have been proposed for the diagnosis of APS. The detection of antibodies directed to domain 1 and 4/5 of ß2-Glycoprotein I (ß2GP1) were found to be particularly sound. Several issues remain to be addressed. We do not yet know what is the physiological function of ß2GP1 and the pathophysiology of thrombosis and pregnancy loss in these patients. Moreover, treatment is poorly defined especially in the case of feared catastrophic APS.

Laboratory testing for antiphospholipid syndrome.

This is a practical report on laboratory tests for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). After a general definition of APS, this study deals with appropriateness and timing in requesting the determination of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies. Lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti ß2-glycoprotein I (aßGPI) are the mandatory tests to be performed, while other tests are not yet validated for clinical use. Interpretation of results is an important discussed issue that implies a close liaison between clinical pathologists and clinicians. Finally, a personal definition of APS according to aPL antibody profile closes the manuscript.

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: Rationale and design of the Trial on Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome (TRAPS) trial.

BACKGROUND: New oral anticoagulants may simplify long-term therapy in conditions requiring anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been extensively studied and is now approved for the prevention and therapy of a number of thromboembolic conditions. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, study that will evaluate if Rivaroxaban 20 mg od (or 15 mg od in patients with moderate renal insufficiency) is non-inferior to warfarin (INR target 2.5), for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding and death in high risk (triple positive) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Secondary endpoints will assess the incidence of any individual component of the composite end point. An external adjudication committee will evaluate all suspected outcome events. This will be a unique trial, as it will enrol the biggest homogenous cohort of high risk APS individuals. CONCLUSION: The methods and the study design should be appropriate to achieve study results that are both scientifically valid and relevant to clinical practice.

Antibodies to Domain 4/5 (Dm4/5) of ß2-Glycoprotein 1 (ß2GP1) in different antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody profiles.

BACKGROUND: Determination of the three recommended tests for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome [Lupus Anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti ß2-Glycoprotein 1 (aß2GP1) antibodies] allow physicians to allocate patients into classification (risk) categories. OBJECTIVES: To measure antibodies of IgG isotype directed towards Domain 4/5 (Dm4/5) of ß2GP1. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we measured IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 in a group of individuals positive for IgG aß2GP1 and classified as triple (LAC+, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n=32), double (LAC-, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n=23) or single positive (LA-, IgG aCL-, IgG aß2GP1+, n=10). RESULTS: Geometric mean and standard deviation of IgG aß2GP1 values expressed as Chemiluminescent Units (CU) in triple, double, single positive groups and in 40 healthy individuals were 1795±783, 321±181, 29±8 and 5.0±1.0, respectively (ANOVA p<0.0001). Geometric mean and standard deviation of IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 expressed as Optical Density (OD) in triple, double and single positive groups and in 40 healthy individuals were 0.16±0.13, 0.16±0.15 and 0.26±0.15, 0.13±0,11, respectively (ANOVA p<0.002). Individuals in the single positive group, expressed significantly higher values with respect to triple (p=0.04) and double (p=0.03) positive groups. Approximate OD cut-off value (99° percentile) calculated in 40 normal control subjects is 0.404. Positivity to IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 according to this cutoff was found in only 5 individuals, 3 in triple positive and 2 in single positive groups and was not associated with thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: Mean level of IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 is higher in single positive group. There is no association between positivity to IgG aß2GP1-Dm4/5 and thromboembolic events.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: antibodies to Domain 1 of ß2-glycoprotein 1 correctly classify patients at risk.

BACKGROUND: Determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and ß2-Glycoprotein 1 (aß2GP1) antibodies is mandatory to classify patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) into risk categories. OBJECTIVES: To measure relevant antibodies, considered to be those of the IgG isotype directed towards ß2GP1 and particularly those directed to Domain 1 (Dm1) of the molecule. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we measured IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 by a chemiluminescent immunoassay in a group of individuals initially positive for IgG aß2GP1 and classified as triple (LAC+, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 32), double (LAC-, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 23) or single positive (LA-, IgG aCL-, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 10). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Geometric mean and standard deviation expressed as chemiluminescent units (CU) in triple, double and single positive groups were 273.0 ± 6.2, 18.2 ± 9.6 and 4.4 ± 2.2, respectively. The geometric mean obtained in 40 healthy subjects was 2.0 ± 2.0. Mean CU values were significantly different among groups and with respect to values found in 40 healthy subjects (P < 0.0001). Positive values of IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 (above 14.2 CU) were found in 45 individuals while 20 individuals (20/65 = 30.8%) positive for IgG aß2GP1 were negative for IgG aß2GPI-Dm1. There was a significant association between positive IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 and thromboembolic events (P = 0.001). Positive and negative values of IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 were consistently confirmed after 12 weeks, with only three low positive values being negative after 12 weeks. In conclusion, IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 seems a robust and reproducible test that in association with the classic tests may be useful in clinical practice in identifying individuals at high risk of developing thromboembolic events.

Confirmation of initial antiphospholipid antibody positivity depends on the antiphospholipid antibody profile.

BACKGROUND: The revised classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome state that antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] and/or anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I [aß2 GPI] antibodies) should be detected on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Consequently, classification of patient risk and adequacy of treatment may be deferred by 3 months. OBJECTIVES: In order to early classify patient risk, we evaluated whether aPL positivity confirmation is related to aPL antibody profiles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to our center who were initially positive in one or more tests exploring the presence of aPL were tested after 3 months. During a 4-year period, 225 patients were initially positive in one or more tests, and 161 were available for confirmation after 3 months. Patients were classified as triple-positive (n = 54: LAC(+) , aCL(+) , aß2 GPI(+) , same isotype), double-positive (n = 50: LAC(-) , aCL(+) , aß2 GPI(+) , same isotype) and single-positive (n = 53: LAC or aCL or aß2 GPI antibodies as the sole positive test). RESULTS: Among subjects with triple positivity at initial testing, 98% (53 of 54) had their aPL profile confirmed after 12 weeks. The double-positive and single-positive groups had data confirmed in 42 of 50 (84%) and 23 of 57 (40%) subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that high-risk subjects with triple-positive aPL profiles are identified early, at the time of the initial screening tests.

Major bleeding in patients undergoing PCI and triple or dual antithrombotic therapy: a parallel-cohort study.

The combination of oral anticoagulants with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-stenting) is subject to controversy due to the high risk of bleeding. In this multicenter retrospective parallel-group study, we compared the rate of adverse events in chronically anticoagulated patients who underwent PCI-stenting and were discharged on aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin (triple antithrombotic therapy [TT] group) and were followed in Italian anticoagulation centers, with a parallel cohort of patients who underwent PCI-stenting and were discharged on DAT group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding while the patients were in TT and DAT. A secondary endpoint was the occurrence of major ischemic adverse events (MACEs). The final cohort consisted of 229 TT patients and 231 DAT patients followed up for 6 and 7 months, respectively. There were 11 (4.8%; 9.1% patient/years) major bleeding events in the TT group (1 was fatal) as compared to 1 (0.4%; 0.7% patient/years) event in the DAT group (p = 0.003). Of the 28 (6.1%) MACE recorded during the follow-up, 12 (5.2%) occurred in the TT group and 16 (6.9%) in the DAT group. In conclusion, despite close monitoring of anticoagulated patients in dedicated centers, the major bleeding incidence remains high among unselected patients undergoing PCI-stenting and treated with TT. Any efforts to minimize these events should be pursued.

Correct laboratory approach to APS diagnosis and monitoring.

Triple positivity (positive Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti ß2-glycoptrotein I antibodies) identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (anti Domain I of ß2-glycoptroteinI) that is present in patients with definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). This is supported by the fact that aß2GPI antibodies obtained by affinity purification in these patients possess LA activity. Moreover, patients and carriers of this profile carry a much higher risk of thrombosis and pregnancy loss than APS patients with positivity for only one of the tests. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as among carriers of aPL. Clinical studies and interventional trials should first take these high risk subjects into consideration.

Interpretation of laboratory data and need for reference laboratories.

A single positive laboratory test among those exploring the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies is not associated with thromboembolic events and does not identify patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. On the other hand, more than one laboratory test positive, and in particular all three tests positive, is strongly associated to thromboembolic events and identifies high risk patients. Triple positivity is in fact related to the presence of a specific anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-Domain I) antibody, also able to prolong coagulation tests. Monoclonal antibodies against Domain I with Lupus Anticoagulant activity might be candidate material for standardization of antiphospholipid assays. Much work remains to be done in this field.

Secondary prevention in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome.

Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is usually made using vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to maintain an international normalized ratio (INR) between 2.0 and 3.0. The optimal intensity of anticoagulation was determined in two prospective randomized controlled trials, both excluding the benefit of more intense anticoagulation. The same regimen is also recommended in patients with APS and arterial thromboembolism as aspirin does not appear to protect against recurrences. The duration of treatment is usually indefinite because of a substantial risk of recurrence.

Circulating ß2 glycoprotein I-IgG anti-ß2 glycoprotein I immunocomplexes in patients with definite antiphospholipid syndrome.

Beta2-glycoprotein I (ß(2)GPI), a relevant antigen in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), binds anionic macromolecules including heparin (Hep). A possible formation of ternary complexes between ß(2)GPI, antibodies and Hep in APS is thus possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate Hep-ß(2)GPI interaction in patients with APS. The affinity of Heps of different length, including unfractionated Hep (UFH), low-molecular weight Hep (enoxaparin) and pentasaccharide (fondaparinux), to human ß(2)GPI was estimated by fluorescence spectroscopy, yielding dissociation constant (K(d)) values of 1.1, 24.0 and 89.4 µM, demonstrating that the longer UFH binds to ß(2)GPI far more tightly than the shorter ones. Plasma and protein G-purified IgGs from eight patients with APS (i.e. five with thromboembolic disease and three with catastrophic APS), were fractionated by affinity chromatography using a Hep (UFH)-bound column, eluted with a linear NaCl gradient. For each chromatographic analysis, fractions were collected in the whole NaCl gradient and tested by ELISA for the presence of ß(2)GPI and anti-ß(2)GPI IgG. The results of Hep-affinity chromatography and ELISAs concurrently indicate that either ß(2)GPI and anti-ß(2)GPI IgG elute from the Hep column in the same chromatographic peak, at a retention time identical to that of the purified, isolated ß(2)GPI, thus suggesting that circulating immunocomplexes containing ß(2)GPI are present in patients with APS.

Antibodies to Domain I of ß(2)Glycoprotein I are in close relation to patients risk categories in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS).

INTRODUCTION: Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity. Antibodies involved in these disorders are mainly those directed against ß(2)-Glycoprotein I (ß(2)GPI) with the major epitope apparently located on discontinuous antigen with several parts of Domain I (DmI) involved. The relation between anti-DmI antibodies and patients' risk categories is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The synthetic full-length and correctly-folded DmI (1-64) to set up a competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assays (ELISA) was used. Plasma of 22 patients with APS and triple positivity [Lupus Anticoagulant positive (LAC+), IgG anti-cardiolipin positive (aCL+), IgG anti-ß(2)GPI positive (a ß(2)GPI +)], 15 with double positivity (IgG aCL+, IgG aß(2)GPI+), 9 with single positivity (IgG aß(2)GPI+) and 20 controls were evaluated. RESULTS: Median of percentage inhibition was 25.5% [interquartile range (IQR)17.2-33.0] in triple positive patients. Significantly lower inhibition was observed in patients with double positivity, median inhibition 5.0% (IQR 0.0-27.0) and in patients with single positivity median inhibition was 2.0% (IQR 0.5-8.0) (p<0.0001). No inhibition was detected in control subjects or using ß(2)GPI peptides (40-52 and 57-70), or when antithrombin, an insignificant control protein was used. CONCLUSIONS: High risk patients with APS and triple laboratory positivity as compared with double and single positivity patients have significantly higher titre of anti-DmI antibodies as evaluated by an inhibition test.

Prevalence and significance of anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies in patients with Lupus Anticoagulant (LA).

OBJECTIVE: Anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies have been found in Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) positive patients. Their prevalence and relative contribution to thromboembolic risk in LA-positive patients is not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine their presence and association with thromboembolic events in a large series of patients with confirmed LA. METHODS: Plasma from LA-positive patients was collected at Thrombosis Centers and sent to a reference central laboratory for confirmation. Positive plasma was tested using home-made ELISA for the presence of aPT and anti-beta(2)GPI antibodies. RESULTS: LA was confirmed in 231 patients. Sixty-one of 231 (26%, 95%CI 22-33) LA positive subjects were positive for IgG aPT and 62 (27%, 95% CI 21-33) were positive for IgM aPT antibodies. Clinical features of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) were not associated with the presence of IgG aPT [43 APS in 61 (70%) positive and 109 APS in 170 (64%) negative IgG aPT subjects, p=ns] or IgM aPT. Rate of positivity of IgG and IgM a beta(2)GPI was significantly higher than that of IgG and IgM aPT. Clinical events accounting for APS occurred in 97 of 130 (75%) IgG a beta(2)GPI positive and in 55 of 101 (54%) IgG a beta(2)GPI negative patients (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.3, p=0.002). No significant association with clinical events in patients positive for both IgG aPT and IgG a beta(2)GPI as compared to those positive for one or another test was found. When patients negative for both IgG aPT and IgG a beta(2)GPI (LA positive only) were compared with remaining patients, a significantly lower association with clinical events was found (OR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.7, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to IgG a beta(2)GPI, the prevalence of IgG aPT in patients with LA is significantly lower and not associated with the clinical features of APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: critical analysis of the diagnostic path.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed in the presence of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity occurring in patients with circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LA] and/or IgG/IgM anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or IgG/IgM anti-beta2glycoprotein I [abeta2GPI] antibodies). Each test may identify different autoantibodies; a single test makes the diagnosis possible when positive on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, single test positivity may be unrelated to pathogenic antibodies, which are now considered to be a subclass of abeta2GPI antibodies directed against the domain I of this protein. Conversely, all three positive tests identify a single class of abeta2GPI antibodies, thus identifying high-risk patients with APS.

Lower versus standard intensity oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) in elderly warfarin-experienced patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

It has been observed that elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) benefit from standard [an international normalised ratio (INR) goal of 2.0-3.0] oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT). The hypothesis that lower-intensity anticoagulation therapy can offset the higher bleeding risk in this population has never been tested in an 'ad hoc' clinical trial. Patients over 75 years of age with NVAF were randomised to receive warfarin to maintain the INR at 1.8 (range 1.5-2.0) or at a standard target of 2.5 (range 2.0-3.0). There were 135 patients in the low-intensity and 132 in the standard-intensity groups. During a mean follow-up lasting 5.1 years, 59 primary outcome events (thromboembolism and major haemorrhage) were recorded, 24 (3.5 per 100 patient-years) in the low-intensity group and 35 (5.0 per 100 patient-years) in the standard-intensity group (HR=0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.1, p=0.1). The reduction in the primary endpoint was mainly due to a diminution in major bleedings (1.9 vs. 3.0 per 100 patient-years; HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p=0.1). The median achieved INR value was 1.86 in the low-intensity and 2.24 in the standard-intensity group (p<0.001). The frequency of INR testing was 26.1 +/- 13.5 vs. 24.3 +/- 11.6 days, p<0.0001). In this exploratory study we observed a low rate of stroke and major bleeding in elderly patients (>75) being managed in an anticoagulation clinic for primary stroke prevention with low-intensity anticoagulation (INR 1.5-2.0). However, further trials are needed to confirm the hypothesis generated by the present study.